Is GHK-Cu more effective for skin or joint/tissue repair?

Primarily skin benefits, but connective tissue sees support.

Skin improvements more noticeable than deep joint repair.

Great for skin quality, secondary tissue repair effects.

Skin elasticity changes faster than joint recovery.

More cosmetic than structural, joints benefit subtly.

Skin healing dominates, tissue repair slower but present.

Better for skin regeneration than heavy joint issues.

Joints may benefit indirectly via collagen signaling.

Skin shows results first, tissues take longer.

Not a joint fix, but supports tissue health.

Strong skin peptide, modest connective tissue support.

Skin repair obvious, joint repair more anecdotal.

Best used for skin, not primary joint therapy